You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2020 >>
[2020] FJHC 857
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
State v Ravia [2020] FJHC 857; HAC430.2018S (19 October 2020)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 430 OF 2018S
STATE
Vs
SETAREKI RAVIA
Counsels : Mr. M. Vosawale and Mr. U. Lal for State
Ms. M. Chand for Accused
Hearings : 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 October, 2020.
Summing Up : 19 October, 2020.
Judgment : 19 October, 2020.
______________________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
______________________________________________________________________________
- The three assessors had returned with a unanimous opinion finding the accused guilty as charged on count no. 1 and 2.
- Obviously, the three assessors had accepted the prosecution’s version of events and it also meant they have accepted their witnesses’
evidence as credible.
- The above also meant they had rejected the accused’s sworn denials and had also rejected his version of events.
- I have reviewed all the evidence called in the trial and I have directed myself in accordance with the summing up I gave the assessors
today.
- The assessors’ opinion was not perverse. It was open to them to reach such conclusion on the evidence.
- Assessors are there to assist the trial judge come to a decision on whether or not the accused was guilty as charged. They represent
the public and their decision must be treated with respect.
- In this case, I accept that the accused voluntarily confessed to the police about the crimes when caution interviewed on 11 November
2018. I also find as a matter of fact that he did so out of his own free will. I find his confession to be true.
- As to PW3’s identification evidence, I find it was of a high quality. The test laid out by R v Turnbull had been met and I accept that she correctly identified the accused committing the crimes against PW1 and PW2.
- Given the above, I accept the three assessors’ unanimous opinion that the accused is guilty as charged on count no. 1 and 2.
I convict him accordingly on those counts.
- Assessors thanked and released.
Salesi Temo
JUDGE
Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva.
Solicitor for the Accused : Legal Aid Commission, Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/857.html