Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA
CASE NO: HAC. 149 of 2020
[CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]
STATE
V
Counsel : Mr. E. Samisoni for the State
Ms. T. Kean for 1st Accused
Ms. N. Mishra for 2nd & 4th Accused
Ms. S. Daunivesi for 3rd Accused
Date of Sentence : 18 September, 2020
SENTENCE
FIRST COUNT
Statement of Offence
AGGRAVATED BURGLARY: contrary to Section 313 (1) (a) of the Crimes Act, 2009.
Particulars of Offence
KAITIVI ALOSIO, KAFOA DION and KOROI TIKOMAIIGILADI, between the 24th day of April, 2020 and the 2nd day of May, 2020, at Raiwai in the Central Division, in the company of another, entered into the premises of SOHED HUSSEIN, as trespassers, with intent to commit theft therein.
SECOND COUNT
Statement of Offence
THEFT: contrary to Section 291 (1) of the Crimes Act, 2009.
Particulars of Offence
KAITIVI ALOSIO, KAFOA DION and KOROI TIKOMAIIGILADI, between the 24th day of April, 2020 and the 2nd day of May, 2020, at Raiwai in the Central Division, in the company of another, dishonestly appropriated (stole) 3 x wall fans, 2 x electric water kettle, 1 rice cooker, 4 x pairs of shoes, 1 x USP Tablet, 1 x sound system speaker, 1 x WIFI Modem, 1 x frying pan, 1 x iron, 1 x pull chopper, 1 x sandwich maker, 1 x man trimmer, 1 x black bag, 1 x red t-shirt, 1 x white collar t-shirt, 1 x black round neck, 1 x brown long neck t-shirt, 1 x green t-shirt, 1 x skull shape music box, 1 x dumbbell, the properties of SOHED HUSSEIN with the intention of permanently depriving SOHED HUSSEIN of the said properties.
THIRD COUNT
Statement of Offence
RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY: contrary to Section 306 (1) of the Crimes Act, 2009.
Particulars of Offence
ISIKELI RATU NANOVU between the 24th day of April, 2020 and 2nd day of May, 2020, dishonestly received stolen propertied namely 1 x long pants, 3 x t-shirts, 1 x Wifi Modem and 1 x wall fan grey in color, knowing or believing the properties to be stolen.
The Complainant is Sohed Hussein (“PW1”) 20 years, student of Block 6 Flat 2, Raj Moti Lal.
The Accused are:
On 02/05/20 at about 10.30am, Samsun Nisha (“PW2”) 58 years, self-employed of Khalsa Road, Tacirua East received a call from PW1’s mother informing him about a recent break in, at a flat which is occupied by PW1.
PW1’s brother namely Zuhaeez Hussein (“PW3”) 23 years, engineer of 148 Sawau, Bayview Heights, had gone by to check on PW1’s flat while PW1 was away and as he entered he noticed that the house had been ransacked. They checked the flat and they found the following items that been stolen:-
Some of the above items were then knowingly received by A1 as those that were stolen by A2, A3 and A4 during the time of the offending.
Later, on 08/05/20, PW1 was called to the Police Station where he identified the following recovered properties as those having belonged to him which had been stolen from hi flat:-
The above properties were seized from some of the Accused themselves and others from whom these properties were sold to them by the respective Accused persons (“searchlists attached herewith”):-
All the accused persons were arrested and thereafter caution interviewed. A2 to A4 all admitted to their involvement in the unlawful entering into PW1’s flat before stealing the above listed properties only some of which were recovered and seized later by the Police.
A1 who was also arrested admitted to having seen the other three Accused persons coming out of PW1’s flat with four stripe bags and a plastic bag containing some items in it, some of which he had later received from the other Accused persons (“All copies of their respective caution interviews are attached herewith”).
All accused persons have nil pc’s.
SUPPLEMENTARY SUMMARY OF FACTS
Further to the Summary of Facts read out and admitted by the accused persons on 10th August 2020, both parties agree to the following:
Table 1.1
| Property | Quantity | Total Value ($) |
| Wall Fan | 3 | 60.00 |
| Electric Kettle | 2 | 40.00 |
| USP Tablet | 1 | 30.00 |
| Sound system speaker | 1 | 20.00 |
| WIFI Modem | 1 | 50.00 |
| Frying Pan | 1 | 200.00 |
| Iron | 1 | 50.00 |
| Pull Chopper | 1 | 15.00 |
| Sandwich Maker | 1 | 60.00 |
| Man Trimmer | 1 | 50.00 |
| Black Bag | 1 | 45.00 |
| Red t-shirt | 1 | 50.00 |
| White collar t-shirt | 1 | 30.00 |
| Black round neck t-shirt | 1 | 30.00 |
| Brown long pants | 1 | 80.00 |
| Green t-shirt | 1 | 25.00 |
| Skull shaped music box | 1 | 40.00 |
| Dumbbell | 1 | 50.00 |
| Rice Cooker | 1 | 80.00 |
| Assorted shoes | 4 pairs | 150.00 |
| Total value of items stolen | | $2215.00 |
Table 2.1
| Property | Quantity | Total Value ($) |
| Wall Fan | 1 | 60.00 |
| Electric Kettle | 1 | 40.00 |
| Man Trimmer | 1 | 50.00 |
| Black bag | 1 | 45.00 |
| Red t-shirt | 1 | 50.00 |
| White collar t-shirt | 1 | 30.00 |
| Black round neck t-shirt | 1 | 30.00 |
| Brown long pants | 1 | 80.00 |
| Green t-shirt | 1 | 25.00 |
| Blue t-shirt | 1 | 50.00 |
| Shull shaped music box | 1 | 40.00 |
| Dumbbell | 1 | 50.00 |
| Assorted shoes | 1pairs | 150.00 |
| Total value of items recovered | | $700.00 |
| Isikeli Nanovu (A1) | $50.00 |
| Kaitivi Alusio (A2) | $120.00 |
| Kafoa Dion (A3) | $130.00 |
| Koroi Tikomaiigiladi (A4) | $300.00 |
| Total Value | $600.00 |
12. Burglary of home must be regarded a serious offence. A home is a private sanctuary for a person. Peore entitled to feel safe and secure in their homes. Any fory form of criminal intrusion of privacy and security of people in their homes must be dealt with condign punishment to denounce the conduct and deter others. As Lord Bingham CJ in Brewster 1998 1 Cr App R 220 observed at 225:
“Domestic burglary is, and always has been, regarded as a very serious offence. It may involve considerable loss to the victim. Even when it does not, the victim may lose possessions of particular value to him or her. To those who are insured, the receipt of financial compensation does not replace what is lost. But many victims are uninsured; because they may have fewer possessions, they are the more seriously injured by the loss of those they do have. The loss of material possessions is, however, only part (and often a minor part) of the reason why domestic burglary is a serious offence. Most people, perfectly legitimately, attach importance to the privacy and security of their own homes. That an intruder should break in or enter, for his own dishonest purposes, leaves the victim with a sense of violation and insecurity. Even where the victim is unaware, at the time, that the burglar is in the house, it can be a frightening experience to learn that a burglary has taken place; and it is all the more frightening if the victim confronts or hears the burglar. Generally speaking, it is more frightening if the victim is in the house when the burglary takes place, and if the intrusion takes place at night; but that does not mean that the offence is not serious if the victim returns to an empty house during the daytime to find that it has been burgled. The seriousness of the offence can vary almost infinitely from case to case. It may involve an impulsive act involving an object of little value (reaching through a window to take a bottle of milk, or stealing a can of petrol from an outhouse). At the other end of the spectrum it may involve a professional, planned organization, directed at objects of high value. Or the offence may be deliberately directed at the elderly, the disabled or the sick; and it may involve repeated burglaries of the same premises. It may sometimes be accompanied by acts of wanton vandalism.”
Sentence of Kaitivi Alosio, Kafoa Dion and Koroi Tikomaiigiladi
Head sentence – 02 years and 04 months
Non-parole period – 01 year and 08 months
Sentence of Isikeli Ratu Nanovu
Isikeli Ratu Nanovu – You are sentenced to an imprisonment term of 06 months. In view of the time spent in custody, time remaining to be served is 02 months
Kaitivi Alosio, Kafoa Dion and Koroi Tikomaiigiladi –
You are sentenced to an imprisonment term of 02 years and 08 months with a non-parole term of 02 years. In view of the time spent in custody, time remaining to be served is;
Head sentence – 02 years and 04 months
Non-parole period – 01 year and 08 months
Vinsent S. Perera
JUDGE
Solicitors;
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the State
Legal Aid Commission for the Accused
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2020/768.html