You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2019 >>
[2019] FJHC 980
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
State v Dabenaise - Sentence [2019] FJHC 980; HAC025.2019S (4 October 2019)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 025 OF 2019S
STATE
vs
EMOSI DABENAISE
Counsels : Ms. U. Tamanikaiyaroi for State
Ms. T. Kean and Ms. M. Cobona for Accused
Hearings : 1 and 2 October, 2019.
Summing Up : 3 October, 2019.
Judgment : 3 October, 2019.
Sentence : 4 October, 2019
______________________________________________________________________________
SENTENCE
______________________________________________________________________________
- In a judgment delivered yesterday you were found guilty of the following offence:
“Count 1
Statement of Offence
RAPE: Contrary to section 207 (1) and (2) (b) and (3) of the Crimes Act 2009.
Particulars of Offence
EMOSI DABENAISE on the 5th day of August, 2013, at Namosi in the Central Division, penetrated the vagina of A.T, a child under the age of 13 years, with his
finger.”
- I note that at the time of the offence, you were 16 years old, thus for the present proceeding, you will be treated as a juvenile.
As a result, you cannot be formally convicted nor sentenced (Section 20, Juvenile Act 1973).
- The brief facts of the case were as follows. After attending a church service in a village in Namosi on 5 August, 2013 after 8pm,
you met the complainant. She was also returning from the church service. She was 8 years old. You were 16 years old. You were
related to her. You were her uncle. You grabbed hold of her hand, closed her mouth with another hand and dragged her to a nearby
unused store. She was wearing a dress and underpants. In the store, you took off her underwear and inserted your finger into her
vagina. The complainant said it was painful. You were disturbed by others. Later, the complainant left the store and went home.
- The offence of “rape” carried a maximum sentence of life imprisonment (section 207 (1) of the Crimes Act 2009). The tariff
for the rape of a child is 11 to 20 years imprisonment: Gordon Aitcheson v The State, Criminal Petition CAV 012 of 2018, Supreme Court of Fiji. But because you were a juvenile at the material time, you can only be
imprisoned to a maximum of 2 years imprisonment (Section 30 (3) of the Juvenile Act 1973).
- Your case demonstrates once again the dilemma of older juveniles sexually abusing younger juveniles. In this case, you were 16 years
old, while the complainant was 8 years old – actually half your age. Worse still, you were her uncle, the very person who
should be protecting her. Older juveniles cannot be allowed to exploit younger juveniles, and get away with a less severe sentence.
A less severe sentence will not act as a deterrence, and could be seen to treating the offender more as a victim than the victim
herself. The victim’s right to be protected and their rights being observed must also be emphasized and noticed by the sentencing
courts.
- You are a first offender. I have taken note of what your Counsel said in mitigation. I have carefully considered the facts of the
case, and in my view, at the time of the offence, you were so unruly a character and/or a depraved character, that you have to be
imprisoned for 2 years. I therefore imprison you for 2 years, to be served in an adult prison, as you no longer a juvenile now.
- Pursuant to Section (4) (1) of the Sentencing and Penalties Act 2009, the above imprisonment is designed to punish you in a manner
that is just in all the circumstances, to protect the community, to deter other would-be offenders and to signify that the court
and community denounce what you did to the 8 year complainant on 5 August 2013.
- You have 28 days to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Salesi Temo
JUDGE
Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva.
Solicitor for the Accused : Legal Aid Commission, Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2019/980.html