Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
WINDING UP ACTION NO.: HBE 12 of 2018
IN THE MATTER of HELIPRO (FIJI) LIMITED a limited liability company having its registered office at Paul McDonnell Lawyers, 1st Floor, Anderson Fong and Son Building, Main Street, Savusavu in Fiji.
AND
IN THE MATTER of the Companies Act
APPEARANCES/REPRESENTATION
APPLICANT : Ms R Lal [Lal/Patel/Bale Lawyers]
RESPONDENT
COMPANY : Mr R Singh [Parshotam Lawyers]
JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Ms Vandhana Lal
DELIVERED ON : 07 February 2019
JUDGMENT
[Winding Up by a Creditor of a Company in Insolvency]
As per the 30 August 2018 order, the Applicant was to file its Affidavit in Reply in 14 days. Hearing was schedule for 28 November 2018.
I found that counsels consenting to late filing of document by other party to which they have to respond to do so at their own risk especially in cases where hearing dates are assigned.
After deliberating on the application, following orders were made:
Hence I shall proceed to determine the application on the Application for winding up with Affidavit Verifying and the Affidavit in Opposition.
Good Livin’ is a creditor of Helipro
Helipro was incorporated in Fiji on 10 August 2012.
He further alleges that Helipro was since December 2016 indebted to Good Livin’ for a sum of USD$25,000 for advances made at the company’s request.
A statutory demand notice was served on the company on 4 December 2017.
However despite service, the Company failed to pay the amount or secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the Applicant.
Helipro denies making any requests for advances from Good Livin’ as they never knew any entity by that name existed.
Helipro is a foreign company and not registered in Fiji.
Office of Paul McDonnell lawyers was closed in February 2016. Mr. McDonnell had provided an affidavit to this effect which was filed on 18 May 2018.
On or about the time the monies were allegedly advanced to Helipro, Helipro was in the process of purchasing a helicopter through Eckhart Helicopter Sales an American Company from an American based hospital called Trevor Corporation.
Mr. Albert Bertini is also a Director of Trivest Investment Limited who was also interested in a helicopter. Hence, Mr. Bertini approached Helipro to help facilitate this for him.
The purchase agreement dated 1 October 2015 is between Trevor Corporation DBA Eckhart Helicopter Sales and to Trivest International Limited to purchase one Agustin 109C helicopter.
Purchase price is for $300,000 US Dollars and the purchaser was to pay deposit of $25,000 in 14 days of execution of the agreement.
This agreement is only signed by the seller.
The arrangement between Helipro and Trivest Investment Limited was:
Helipro was engaged by Trivest International Limited. It commenced services including arranging for an aviation specialist engineer to inspect the two helicopters for air-worthiness, ensure all log books were in order, dissembling the helicopter and packaging in a container for transportation to Fiji; purchasing specialist tooling for the helicopters, assembling the two helicopters and having them certified by Civil Aviation Authority of Fiji.
All this was to be done at Helipro’s own cost.
Since Insurance was required Helipro arranged for this.
In return Trivest International Limited would pay the deposit sum of US$25,000 each for the purchase of the two helicopters. No monies were to be refunded by Helipro as it was to bear other related cost.
When the deposit became due and payable, Helipro was contacted by Escrow Account Holders informing them that Good Livin’ Pty Limited had deposited US $50,000 into the Escrow account.
According to Helipro, this was not their concern as this obligation was to be fulfilled by Trivest International Limited. There was no contractual agreement between Helipro and Good Livin’ Pty Limited.
On its part Helipro had fulfilled its side of the arrangement with Trivest International Limited.
Claim if any by Good Livin’ lies with Trivest and not Helipro.
They further say that they did not receive any demand for US$25,000 from Good Livin’ as it had arrangement with Trivest for the purchase of the two Helicopters.
The Company further alleges that it was never served with a Statutory Demand. It only received information of the Winding Up Application at about 3pm on Friday 27 April 2018.
Helipro contacted one Ryan Fong through its solicitors and were advised someone had approached Mr. Fong in December 2017 asking for Mr. Paul McDonnell office. The person left without leaving any paper.
The Applicant was aware of the Company’s place of business and could have served the Statutory Demand on to the place of business when it found out the Registered Office was closed.
Since the Statutory Demand was never brought to the attention of the company, it could not have complied with or disputed the amount within the prescribed three (3) weeks.
Helipro is able to meet its legitimate financial obligation as it is in a healthy financial position.
Mr. Fong informed the person that Mr. McDonnell’s Office was closed some time ago and he provided this person with Mr. McDonnell’s number.
According to Mr. Fong, this person did not leave any papers with him or at the building.
“A company or foreign company is solvent if and only if it is able to pay all its debts, as and when they become due and payable”.
“Unless the contrary can be proven to the satisfaction of the Court, a Company must be deemed to be unable to pay its debts-
(a) If a creditor, by assignment or otherwise, to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding $10,000 or such other Prescribed Amount then due, has served on the Company, by leaving it at the Registered Office of the Company, a demand requiring the Company to pay the sum so due (‘the Statutory Demand”) and the Company has, not paid the sum or secured or compounded for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor within 3 weeks of the date of the notice; or ....”
“On 4th December, 2017, the Applicant via its lawyers Lal Patel Bale Lawyers served on the Company a demand signed by the lawyers requiring the Company to pay the amount mentioned in paragraph 5, now produced and shown to me and marked with the letters “AB2”is a true copy of the demand for USD$25, 000.00 [Twenty Five Thousand American Dollars]”.
Notice was issued by Solicitor for the Creditor Messrs Lal Patel Bale Lawyers.
At the bottom of the back page a name “Ryan Fong” with date 6 December 2017 is handwritten.
Hence I find the company was not duly served with a Statutory Demand as required under section 515 of the Company Act.
................................
Vandhana Lal [Ms]
Acting Master
At Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2019/76.html