Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
[CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 310 of 2018
BETWEEN : STATE
AND : KELEPI VANAVANA
Counsel : Ms. B. Kantharia for the State
Ms. L. Ratidara with Ms. E. Soata for the Accused
Hearing on : 04th of June – 10th of June 2019
Summing up on : 12th of June 2019
Judgement on : 20th of June 2019
Sentence on : 16th of July 2019
SENTENCE
Statement of Offence
RAPE: Contrary to section 207(1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Act of 2009.
Particulars of Offence
Kelepi Vanavana, on the 17th day of May, 2018, at Suva, in the Eastern Division, penetrated the vagina of Sereana Tukana, with his penis without her consent.
“....It must be recognized by the Courts that the crime of rape has become altogether too frequent and that the sentences imposed by the Courts for that crime must more nearly reflect the understandable public outrage.”
“Parliament has prescribed the sentence of life imprisonment for rape. Rape is the most serious sexual offence. The Courts have reflected increasing public intolerance for this crime by hardening their hearts to offenders and meting out harsher sentences”.
“The Courts have made it clear that rapists will be dealt with severely. Rape is generally regarded as one of the gravest sexual offences. It violates and degrades a fellow human being. The physical and emotional consequences to the victim are likely to be severe. The Courts must protect women from such degradation and trauma. The increasing prevalence of such offending in the community calls for deterrent sentences.”
“We consider that in any rape case without aggravating or mitigating features the starting point for sentencing an adult should be a term of imprisonment of seven years. It must be recognized by the Courts that the crime of rape has become altogether too frequent and that the sentences imposed by the Courts for that crime must more nearly reflect the understandable public outrage.”
14. The aggravating factors are as follows:
(i) You were a close relation and a neighbor of the complainant. You called her “Bu Sere” and she is elderly, as well as comparatively feeble too. Instead of protecting her you have breached the trust expected from you and the breach was gross.
(ii) The act was preplanned. As transpired in evidence, you have planned this act for a time and executed it in the pretext of drunkenness.
(iii) You took advantage of the complainant’s vulnerability and helplessness.
(iv) You without any valid reason alleged her to have had a loose life and tried to tarnish her character.
(v) As apparent from victim impact report, the complainant has gone and will go through immense hardships and difficulties due to this illegal act of the accused.
17. In considering that you are a first time offender and the rest of the mitigating factors submitted on your behalf I deduct two years from the above.
19. Section 24 of the Sentencing and Penalties Act reads thus:
“If an offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, any period of time during which the offender was held in custody prior to the trial of the matter or matters shall, unless a court otherwise orders, be regarded by the court as a period of imprisonment already served by the offender.”
Head Sentence - 08 years and 06 months.
Non-parole period - 06 years and 06 months.
22. You have 30 days to appeal to the Court of Appeal if you desire so.
Chamath S. Morais
JUDGE
At Suva
16th July 2019
Solicitors for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Suva.
Solicitors for the Accused : Office of the Legal Aid Commission, Suva.
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2019/712.html