PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2018 >> [2018] FJHC 959

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Fiji National Provident Fund Board v Registrar of Companies [2018] FJHC 959; HBC258.2018 (2 October 2018)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CIVIL JURISDICTION


Civil Action No. HBC 258 of 2018


BETWEEN: THE FIJI NATIONAL PROVIDENT FUND BOARD a body corporate having its registered office at 33 Ellery Street, Suva.


PLAINTIFF


AND: REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES having its registered office at Level 2, Suvavou House, Suva.


DEFENDANT


BEFORE: Justice V D Sharma


COUNSEL: Ms. Saiboba L - for the Plaintiff

Ms. Ali - for the Defendant


DATE OF DECISION: 02nd October, 2018 @ 9.30 am


DECISION


[Originating Summons seeking an order for the Extension of Time for the Defendant to register
a change in favour of the Plaintiff in the Records of Fiji Sugar Corporation Limited pursuant to
Order 7 Rule 2 of the High Court Rules, 1988 and section 376 of the Companies Act, 2015]


INTRODUCTION


  1. Before this court is Plaintiff’s Originating Summons seeking for the following relief –
  2. This application is made pursuant of Order 7 Rule 2 of the High Court Rules, 1988 and section 376 of the Companies Act, 2015 and on reliance of the Affidavit of Ms. Melaia Bai filed herein.
  3. The Originating Summons was initially filed Ex-Parte and a returnable date was accordingly assigned for the court’s determination.
  4. Upon the perusal of the application and the orders sought therein, this court was of view and hence directed that the Originating Summons should be made Inter-Parte and accordingly served on the Defendant.

THE LAW


  1. Section 376 of the Companies act, 2015 provides of Extension of Time to Register charges-

“The Court, on being satisfied that the omission to register a Charge within the time required by this Act, or that the omission or misstatement of any particular with Respect to any such Charge or in a memorandum of satisfaction, was accidental, or due to inadvertence or to some other sufficient cause, or is not of a nature to prejudice the position of the creditors or Members of the Company, or that, on other grounds it is just and equitable to grant relief, may, on the application of the Company or any person interested and on such terms and conditions as seem to the Court just and expedient, order that the time for registration must be extended, or, as the case may be, that the omission or misstatement must be rectified”.


DISCUSSION AND DETERMINATION


  1. The counsel representing the Defendant appraised court of the following issues and non-compliance by the Plaintiffs:
  2. The counsel further informed court that if the Plaintiff is able to fully comply with all the requirements of the law coupled with furnishing court with the statement of particulars of the Charge and the Mortgage Debenture (Instrument), then the defendant may consent to the orders sought by the Plaintiff in the application filed herein.
  3. In reply, the Plaintiff’s counsel sought a short adjournment to comply with all the requirements as raised herein above and accordingly will file a supplementary of affidavit.
  4. The matter was adjourned to 02nd October 2018 and the Defendant’s counsel confirmed to court that the Plaintiff has now fully compiled and satisfied the requirements of Section 376 of the Companies act 2015 and will therefore now consent to the orders sought herein by the Plaintiff.
  5. At this point in time, the Plaintiff withdrew the order for any cost against the Defendant.
  6. Accordingly, the Court being satisfied that the Plaintiff has now fully compiled with all the requirements and the law, this Court proceeded to grant the following final orders by consent:

Dated at Suva this 02nd Day of October, 2018


..............................................
Vishwa Datt Sharma
Judge



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2018/959.html