You are here:
PacLII >>
Databases >>
High Court of Fiji >>
2018 >>
[2018] FJHC 1172
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Decisions
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Download original PDF
Rawalai v State [2018] FJHC 1172; HAM295.2018 (6 December 2018)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. HAM 295 OF 2018
BETWEEN SOVITA TURAGABECI RAWALAI
APPLICANT
AND THE STATE
RESPONDENT
Counsels : Mr. T. Ravumiwa for Applicant
Mr. Y. Prasad for Respondent
Hearing : 06th December, 2018
Ruling : 06th December, 2018
RULING ON BAIL
- Every accused person has a right to trial unless the interest of justice requires otherwise. The test for bail is whether or not,
he will turn up on the trial date to take his trial. The court must consider the factors in Section 19 of the Bail Act 2002 before it makes a decision on the above.
- The prosecution said they have a strong case. They rely on the complainant’s direct evidence. They said, the accused allegedly
punched and strangled her, before he raped her. They said, by assaulting her prior to the offence, he knew she was not consenting
to sex at the time. Prosecution said, the medical reports and the accused’s alleged partial confession to support the above.
If found guilty after trial, accused is looking at 12 to 16 years imprisonment.
- He will be tried late next year, or early 2020. The court can hold him in custody 2 years prior to trial. If found guilty, this
will be deducted from his final sentence. He is represented by experience counsel and he can visit him in custody to prepare his
defence. He is not incapacitated and there appears to be no reason for him to be at liberty for other lawful reasons.
- The allegations against the accused are very serious. He allegedly assaulted and raped the complainant behind a house. They are
related. Prosecution also said, accused may interfere with witness. In my view, although the accused is presumed innocent until
proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, he should be remanded in custody in the public interest and to protect society.
- Because of the above reasons, bail is denied.
- Remanded in custody until further orders of court.
Salesi Temo
JUDGE
Solicitor for Applicant : Legal Aid Commission, Suva
Solicitor for Respondent : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Suva
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2018/1172.html