PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2017 >> [2017] FJHC 946

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Valo [2017] FJHC 946; HAC048.2016LAB (15 December 2017)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LABASA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 048 OF 2016LAB


STATE


vs


VILIAME VALO


Counsels : Ms. A. Vavadakua for State
Ms. C. Choy and Mr. J. Korotini for Accused


Hearings : 13 and 14 December, 2017
Summing Up : 15 December, 2017
Judgment : 15 December, 2017


________________________________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
________________________________________________________________________________________


1. The three assessors had returned with a unanimous guilty opinion on all counts i.e. they found the accused guilty of the two counts of rape i.e. counts no. 1 and 3, and guilty of one count of sexual assault (i.e. count no. 2)


2. Obviously, the three assessors accepted the prosecution’s version of events, which meant they accepted the complainant’s evidence and version of events. The above also meant they had rejected the accused’s sworn denials.


3. I have reviewed the evidence called in the trial and I have directed myself in accordance with the summing up I gave the assessors today.


4. Assessors are there to assist the trial judge come to a decision on whether or not the accused was guilty as charged. The assessors represent the public view on the case and it must be taken seriously, especially when they are unanimous.


5. Like the three assessors, I find the complainant a credible witness and I accept her evidence and version of events. In my view, she was forthright in her answers and she was telling the truth. PW3’s evidence merely supported the complainant’s version of events. The doctor’s evidence also supported the complainant’s version of events.


6. The accused’s evidence was not credible in my view and thus I reject his denials.


7. Given the above, I accept the three assessors’ unanimous opinion and I find the accused guilty as charged on all counts. I convict him accordingly on those counts.


8. Assessors thanked and released.


Salesi Temo

JUDGE


Solicitor for State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecution, Labasa
Solicitor for Accused : Office of Legal Aid Commission, Labasa



PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2017/946.html