PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2016 >> [2016] FJHC 604

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Prime Land Development Ltd v Bong [2016] FJHC 604; HBC213.201 (7 July 2016)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION


High Court CivilAction No. 213/2012

BETWEEN
:
PRIME LAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED a limited liability company having its registered office at Suva.


Plaintiff
AND
:
LEE JOO BONG of 46 Fasa Avenue, Martintar, Nadi, Businessman.



Defendant
Appearances
:
M/S S.B. Patel & Co. for the Plaintiff


M/S Koyas for the Defendant



R U L I N G


  1. The plaintiff (“Prime Land”) entered default judgement against the defendant (“Bong”) on 21 November 2012 on account of Bong’s failure to file and serve a statement of defence.
  2. Before me now is the Bong’s application to set aside the default judgement.
  3. The default judgement in this case was entered regularly.
  4. The principles of setting aside default judgement are clear.
  5. A default judgement as of right.
  6. However, where the default judgement160; tfault judgement&#16> (seeu>Fiji Sugar Corpororporation Limited v Ismail [1988] FJCA 1; [1988] 34 FLR 75 (8 July 1988)).
  7. This does not mean that the defendant must establish its defence. He only need to establish a prima facie defence (Evans v Bartlam).
  8. In the case of Fiji Sugar Corporation Limited v Ismail, the Fiji Court Appeal said that:

“.....a draft defence is not necessary, what is required is the affidavit disclosing of prima facie defence.


  1. The Court also said that although there is no rule that the defendant must satisfy the court that there is a reasonable explanation why judgment was allowed to go by default it is something which the Court can consider in the exercise of its discretion whether or not to set aside the default junt.

&;The principle obviously is that, unless and until the court has pronounced a judgment upon upon the merits or by consent, it is to hhe power to revoke the expression of its coercive power wher where that has been obtained only by a failure to follow any of the rules of procedure."


  1. Having perused the statement of claim filed by Prime Land on 04 October 2012 and the affidavit of Ms. Laisani Tabuakuro for and on behalf of Bong,and which is filed herein support of the summons to set aside default judgement, I am satisfied that Bong has a meritorious defence.
  2. My reasons follow:
  3. I think the line of the proposed defence raises triable issues.
  4. Accordingly, I set aside default judgement. Costs to the plaintiff which I summarily assess at $800 (eight hundred dollars only).
  5. Defendant to file and serve statement of defence in 21 days i.e. by 28 July 2016. 14 days thereafter to Plaintiff to file and serve reply i.e. by 11 August 2016.
  6. Case adjourned to 22 August 2016 for mention at 10.30 a.m.

.................................
Anare Tuilevuka
JUDGE
07 July 2016


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2016/604.html