PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2014 >> [2014] FJHC 129

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


Caucau v State [2014] FJHC 129; HAM272.2013 (7 March 2014)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION


Crim. Misc. Case No: HAM 272/2013


BETWEEN:


TUTUNISAU CAUCAU
APPLICANT


AND:


THE STATE
RESPONDENT


COUNSEL : Mr J Savou for the Applicant
Mr Y Prasad for the State


Hearing Date : 28/02/2014
Ruling Date : 07/03/2014


RULING


[01] The applicant Tutunisau Caucau had applied for bail pending trial for the third time.


[02] The applicant has been charged for one count of Rape Contrary to Section 207(1) and (2) (a) of the Crimes Decree No: 44 of 2009.


[03] The applicant submits that he has a change of circumstance to seek bail from this court. In support he has submitted a letter from his wife.


[04] The Applicant submits that the owner of the house, where his family resides at present, is coming to re-occupy in the year 2014. He seeks bail in order to support his family as he is the sole bread winner of the family.


[05] The State opposes the bail. The State submits that the applicant was released on bail by High Court, Suva on 17/07/2012. After his release on bail he has been arrested for another offence of Rape. The case is pending before High Court of Lautoka (HAC 107/13).


[06] The applicant is charged for one count of Rape and he is in remand for this case since 09/08/2013. The charge filed against the accused is very serious.


[07] Trial date has been already set in this case. Trial will be taken up between 17-21/11/2014.


[08] The applicant reoffended on a similar charge of Rape while he was on bail granted by this court. He has breached his bail conditions imposed in this case. Under these circumstances, granting bail to the applicant second time would definitely endanger the public interest or make the protection of the community more difficult.


[09] Considering all these factors into account, especially Applicant's reoffending in a similar offence; it is not in the interest of justice to grant bail to the Applicant.


[10] Bail refused.


[11] 30 days to appeal.


P Kumararatnam
JUDGE


At Suva
07/03/2014


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2014/129.html