PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2013 >> [2013] FJHC 627

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Chand [2013] FJHC 627; HAC064.2011S (20 November 2013)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 064 OF 2011S


STATE


vs


RONEEL CHAND


Counsels : Mr. L. Fotofili and Mr. R. Kumar for State
Mr. T. Ravuniwa for Accused
Hearings : 5th to 8th and 11th to 15th November, 2013
Summing Up : 18th November, 2013
Judgment : 19th November, 2013
Sentence : 20th November, 2013


SENTENCE


  1. In a judgment delivered yesterday, you were found guilty and convicted of murdering your wife, on 19th February 2011, at Nasinu in the Central Division, contrary to section 237 of the Crimes Decree 2009.
  2. The facts were disturbing. When everyone was out of your house at Reba Circle, Nadera, on 19th February 2011, between 9 am and 10 am and thereabout, you set your wife on fire. This was after a heated domestic argument. Your wife took herself to CWM Hospital, suffering from "first degree burns to 40% of her body". Five days later on 24th February 2011, she passed away. You certainly did a conduct (ie. burning your wife), which conduct lead to her death, as a result of severe burn injuries (conduct caused death), and at the time, you intended to cause her death (intent to kill).
  3. In State v Seremaia Naidole Momo, HAC 086 of 2011S, High Court, Suva, I said the following, "..."Murder" is a serious offence, and it is often said, to be at the top of the criminal calendar. It carries a mandatory penalty of life imprisonment. (Section 237, Crime Decree 2009). The court has the power to fix a non-parole period to be served, before a prisoner is eligible for parole. Case precedents show that the non-parole period for murder varies widely, depending on the peculiar facts of the case. In Waisale Waqanivalu v The State, Criminal Appeal No. CAV 0005 of 2007, Supreme Court, Fiji, on 5 counts of murder and 1 of attempted murder, the accused was given 19 years non–parole period on each murder count, and 10 years consecutive on a pending prison sentence, total non-parole period was 26 years. In State v Niume & Others, Criminal Case No. HAC 010 of 2010, High Court, Suva, on 2 counts of murder, Accused No. 1 was given 25 years non-parole period for the murder counts. In State v Ashwin Chand, Criminal Case No. HAC 032 of 2005, High Court, Lautoka, on a count of murder, the accused was given a non-parole period of 22 years. In State v Navau Lebobo, Criminal Case No. HAC 016 of 2002, High Court, Suva, the non-parole period was 20 years. Twenty years non-parole period were also imposed in the following three cases: State v Anesh Ram, Criminal Case No. HAC 124 of 2008S, High Court, Suva; State v Bharat Lal & Others, Criminal Case No. HAC 061 of 2009S, High Court, Suva, and The State v Salesi Balekivuya, Criminal Case No. 095 of 2010S, High Court, Suva. In State v Tukana, Criminal Case No. HAC 021 of 2009, High Court, Lautoka, the non-parole period was 11 years. The non-parole period imposed will depend on the mitigating and aggravating factors..."
  4. The aggravating factors, in this case, were as follows:
  5. The mitigation factors, were as follows:
  6. For murdering your wife on 19th February 2011, I sentence you to the mandatory life imprisonment.
  7. For the non-parole period, I start with 16 years imprisonment. I add 5 years for the aggravating factors, making a total of 21 years. I deduct 3 years for the mitigating factors, leaving a balance of 18 years imprisonment.
  8. In summary, I sentence you to life imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 years imprisonment, effective forthwith.

Salesi Temo
JUDGE


Solicitor for State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Suva.
Solicitor for Accused : T. Ravuniwa, Barrister and Solicitor, Suva.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2013/627.html