PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2013 >> [2013] FJHC 243

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

  Download original PDF


State v Koroinavosa [2013] FJHC 243; HAC059(B).2010S (17 May 2013)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA


CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. HAC 059(B) OF 2010S


STATE


vs


JOSAIA KOROINAVOSA


Counsels : Ms. S. Naidu for the State
Mr. N. Sharma for Accused
Hearings : 16th and 30th April, 2013
Sentencing : 17th May, 2013


SENTENCE


  1. On 16th April, 2013, in the presence of your counsel, you appeared on the following information:

FIRST COUNT
Statement of Offence


AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: Contrary to Section 311 (1) (a) of the Crimes Decree, 2009.


Particulars of Offence


JOSAIA KOROINAVOSA with OTHERS, on the 15th day of February, 2010 at Suva in the Central Division, robbed KAVITESH KRISHANT LAL of one Nokia Mobile Phone valued at FD$40.00 and immediately before the robbery force was used on the said KAVITESH KRISHANT LAL.


SECOND COUNT
Statement of Offence


THEFT OF A MOTOR VEHICLE: Contrary to Section 291 (1) of the Crimes Decree, 2009.


Particulars of Offence


JOSAIA KOROINAVOSA with OTHERS, on the 15th day of February, 2010, at Suva in the Central Division, dishonestly appropriated a motor vehicle registration number FD 722 belonging to KAVITESH KRISHANT LAL, with the intention of permanently depriving the said KAVITESH KRISHANT LAL of the said motor vehicle.


THIRD COUNT
Statement of Offence


WRONGFUL CONFINEMENT: Contrary to Section 286 of the Crimes Decree, 2009.


Particulars of Offence


JOSAIA KOROINAVOSA with OTHERS, on the 15th day of February, 2010, at Suva in the Central Division, wrongfully confined KAVITESH KRISHANT LAL in a motor vehicle registration number FD 722.


FOURTH COUNT
Statement of Offence


AGGRAVATED ROBBERY: Contrary to Section 311(1)(b) of the Crimes Decree, 2009.


Particulars of Offence


JOSAIA KOROINAVOSA with OTHERS, on the 15th day of February, 2010 at Suva in the Central Division, being armed with offensive weapons robbed DEE CEES BUS COMPANY LIMITED with cash and cheques to the total value of FD$26,820.20.


  1. Your counsel indicated to the court that you are prepared to take a plea, after receiving legal advice. The information was then put to you. It was read and explained to you. You said, you understood the same. Then you pleaded guilty to all the four counts.
  2. On 30th April, 2013, the prosecutor read the summary of facts in court. Briefly, it was as follows. On 15th February, 2010, the accused was 28 years old, married without any child. At the time, he resided at Narere with his wife, and was renting a house for $250 per month. He worked at the Fiji Golf Club in Vatuwaqa as a caddy boy. According to him, he earned about $500 per week.
  3. Prior to the 15th February, 2010, the accused and others planned to rob the Dee Cees Bus Company at Lot 4, Taramati Street, Vatuwaqa. They needed transport to and from the crime scene. The accused arranged for the same by contacting the complainant in counts nos. 1, 2 and 3. The complainant drives a van registration number FD 722. On 15th February, 2010, at about 7.30am, the accused called the complainant, to arrange for a job. At 8.30 am, the accused was at the Fiji Golf Club.
  4. He was collecting empty beer bottles to be used in the robbery as weapons. After midday, the accused was picked up by others, who were now in control of FD 722. They went to the Dee Cees Bus Company depot. The company was about to do its banking. It had $26,820.00 cash in a bag, in a car, which was to be used for the banking. The accused and his friends, armed with cane knifes, attacked the bus company employees, and fled with the $26,820. Nothing was recovered. On 17th, 18th and 19th February, 2010, the accused was caution interviewed by police. He admitted the offences. He was formally charged on 19th February, 2010.
  5. The court then checked with the accused's counsel to see that the accused had admitted all the elements of the offences in counts nos. 1 to 4. Through his counsel, the accused admitted all the particulars of offences in counts nos. 1 to 4. As a result, the court found him guilty as charged on all counts, and convicted him accordingly, on those counts.
  6. Out of all the offences, "aggravated robbery" was the most serious. It carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment. [Section 311 (1)(a) and (b) of Crimes Decree 2009]. The tariff is a sentence between 8 to 14 years imprisonment: see State v Manoa, Criminal Case No. HAC 108 of 2009 and HAC 61 of 2010, High Court, Suva and State v Sakiusa Rokonakete and Others, Criminal Case No. HAC 118 of 2007, High Court, Suva.
  7. "Theft" carries a maximum sentence of 10 years imprisonment [section 291 (1) of Crimes Decree 2009]. The tariff is a sentence between a suspended prison sentences to 3 years imprisonment: see State v Mucunabitu and Others, Criminal Case No. HAC 017 of 2010L, High Court, Lautoka and Josevati Nakadi v The State, Criminal Appeal No. HAA 32 of 2010S, High Court, Suva.
  8. "Wrongful confinement" carries a maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment [section 286 of Crimes Decree 2009]. The final sentence will depend on the aggravating and mitigating factors.
  9. The aggravating factors were as follows:
  10. The mitigating factors were as follows:
  11. I start with count no. 4, "aggravated robbery", the most serious of all counts. I start with a sentence of 10 years imprisonment. I increase the same by 7 years for the aggravating factors, making a total of 17 years imprisonment. For the mitigating factors, I decrease the above by 5 years, leaving a balance of 12 years imprisonment. I sentence you, Josaia Koroinavosa, to 12 years imprisonment on count no. 4.
  12. On count no. 1, I start with 8 years imprisonment. I add 2 years for the aggravating factors, making a total of 10 years imprisonment. I deduct 3 years for the mitigating factors, leaving a balance of 7 years imprisonment.
  13. On count no. 2, I sentence you to 2 years imprisonment.
  14. On count no. 3, I sentence you to 2 years imprisonment.
  15. In summary, your sentences are as follows:

All the above sentences are concurrent to each other, that is, a total sentence of 12 years imprisonment.


  1. Because you pleaded guilty to the charges, I direct that the above total sentence of 12 years imprisonment, be made concurrent to your present prison sentence.
  2. In summary, I sentence you, Josaia Koroinavosa, to a total sentence of 12 years imprisonment, concurrent to your present prison term.

Salesi Temo
JUDGE


Solicitor for the State : Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Suva.
Solicitor for Accused : Legal Aid Commission, Suva.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2013/243.html