Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal No.05 of 2009
BETWEEN:
SANJAY SINGH VERMA and BABITA KUMAR VERMA APPELANTS
AND:
VILISONI & VILIAME QALOBOGIDUA
RESPONDENTS
Appellants in person
1st Respondent in person
2nd Respondent absent and unrepresented
Date of hearing: 25th August, 2011
JUDGMENT
The grounds appeal provide the Learned Magistrate erred in law and in fact by:
The central issue which arises in this Appeal is whether the learned Magistrate was entitled to impose costs on each party in the absence of the parties.
In my view,on a judgment summons date, if the judgment debtor is not present in court, the Magistrate may issue a bench warrant requiring him to attend court.
Grounds 1,2 and 3 take issue with the Magistrate failing to evaluate evidence that one of the respondents "was present outside the court" and that the "Appellants.. requested (that the case) stand down .. until 2pm". It would suffice to state that parties are required to be in court, when a case is taken up.
I do not find any finding of the Magistrate as stated in ground 5 of this appeal.
I set aside the order of the Magistrate imposing costs on the parties and issue open bench warrant to the respondents to appear before the Magistrate and show means as to how they would pay their debt. I make no order as to costs.
A.L.B.Brito-Mutunayagam
Judge
31st January, 2012
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2012/846.html