PacLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

High Court of Fiji

You are here:  PacLII >> Databases >> High Court of Fiji >> 2011 >> [2011] FJHC 132

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Decisions | Noteup | LawCite | Download | Help

Vusonitokalau v New World Ltd [2011] FJHC 132; HBC043.2009L (3 March 2011)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION


Civil Action No. HBC 043 of 2009L


BETWEEN:


APISAI VUSONITOKALAU of Rarawai, Bam, Unemployed.
Plaintiff


AND:


NEW WORLD LIMITED a limited liability company having its registered office at Kings Road, Ba.
1st Defendant


AND:


SOFINA MOREEN BEGUM father's name Hussain Khan of Navatu, Ba, Housewife.
2nd Defendant


Before: Master Anare Tuilevuka
Solicitors: Chaudhary & Associates for the Plaintiff
: N/A for the Defendants
Date of Ruling: 03rd March 2011


RULING
BACKGROUND


[1]. On the 9th of July 2007, Apisai Vusonitokalau ("Apisai") - the plaintiff, was walking along Tabua Place in Ba when he was hit by a car. The registration number of that car was CY591. It was being driven by Sofina Morren Begum ("Begum") - the 2nd defendant. It is alleged that Begum was a servant/agent of New World Limited ("New World") at the time of the accident. Hence, New World is also being sued in this case. Apisai's statement of claim alleges negligence against Begum. The particulars of negligence are set out in the statement of claim.

[2]. Begum was charged for careless driving and on 31st of May 2007, she was convicted as charged under sections 99 (1) and 114 of the Land Transport Act 1988. She was also convicted on one count of driving a motor vehicle without a driver's licence.

[3]. Begum was fined $150-oo (one hundred and fifty dollars). She has since paid her fine at the LTA office. Apisai's claim relies on that conviction on the issue of negligence.

[4]. Apisai suffered severe personal injuries as a result of the accident. The particulars of these are set out in the statement of claim:

Particulars of Injuries


Admitted to Lautoka Hospital

His right leg was deformed painful and difficult to move.


INVESTIGATIONS


Radiological x-rays revealed fracture of the right tibia and fibula.


TREATMENT


Pain relief

Manipulation under Anasesthesia

Long leg cast

Physiotherapy

Walking with crutches

He was discharged on 13th July 2007 and was subsequently reviewed in the orthopedic clinic.

He was last reviewed on 13th August 2008 and was noted to be still walking with crutches.


[5]. The defendants have never bothered to file a statement of defence. And so – on 7th of August 2009, default judgment was entered against them both. That was followed immediately by the filing of notice of assessment of damages on the 12th of August 2009. These – according to two affidavits of service of Rajesh Muni Ratnam, a registered bailiff – have both been served on New World and Begum.

[6]. Thereafter, the matter was called before me on the 7th of September 2009 when Mr. Suresh Maharaj appeared for Sahu Khan & Sahu Khan for the defendants. On Mr. Maharaj's application, the defendants were given 21 days to set aside the default judgment.

[7]. There were to be several call overs of this matter with counsel appearing and informing the court that parties were talking settlement. However, when no settlement happened, I finally set the case down for hearing on assessment of damages to the 17th of May 2010. That hearing did not proceed. After some more adjournments - the hearing finally took place on the 24th of August 2010.

EVIDENCE


[8]. Apisai gave the following evidence on oath.

[9]. Dr. Joeli Mareko also gave evidence. He is a Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon at Lautoka Hospital. He came to court with Apisai's hospital folder and read from a Medical Report on Apisai that he had prepared in March 2009.

[10]. According to Dr. Mareko, when Apisai arrived at hospital, his right leg was deformed and not in proper position. An x-ray revealed that Apisai had a fracture of the bone in the right leg. It was a simple fracture. Apisai was given pathedene narcotics and manipulation under anesthesia.

[11]. Dr. Mareko tried to put the bones in place and then he put a cast around Apisai's right leg. He prescribed physiotherapy for Apisai and also ordered a pair of crutches.

[12]. Apisai's right leg has shortened since the accident. This is because the bone of the right leg is not healing in proper position. Because of the shortness of the right leg, Apisai will now have to walk with a gait. Also, he will feel extra weight on the shorter leg. He would have problems in kneeling, running, walking up steps and even sitting in toilet pits. He assesses Apisai's incapacity at 10% to 15%. He said that Apisai would need pain killer in the future to manage his pain.

[13]. Mr. Chaudhary submits as follows (see middle column). My assessment is on the far right column.
SCHEDULE OF DAMAGES
Head of Damage
Mr. Chaudhary's Assessment
My Assessment
  1. General Damages
(pain & suffering, and loss amenities )
$40,000.00
  • $25,000 for past
  • $15,000 for future
$40,000.00
(agreed after considered in Aklesh Narayan v Vicki Narayan [2009] FJHC 193; HBC22.2003L (8 September 2009)
  1. Loss of Earning Capacity
$5,200.00 (2 years @ $50 per week)
(agree with $50 per week. Also agree with 2 years as multiplier considering his age).
  1. Special Damages
$340.00
Agree. ($240 for transport and $100 for medicine)
  1. Interest


@ 6% on $25,000.00 from date of filing of writ to date of judgment =

  • $4,500 - 18th March 2009 to 04th March 2011.
@ 3% on $340.00 from date of filing of writ to date of judgment

  • $ 30.60

TOTAL AWARD


$50,070.60

Costs


$1,500.00

[14] Accordingly, I enter judgment against the defendants in the sum of $50,070.60 plus costs in the sum of $1,500.00


Anare Tuilevuka
Master


At Suva
03rd March 2011.


PacLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2011/132.html