Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
ACTION NO. HBC0207 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
TAINA RUVE
PLAINTIFF
AND:
MARIA VICTORIANO
DEFENDANT
Mr Nacolawa for the Plaintiff
No appearance for the Defendant
Date of Hearing: 3 June 2005
Date of Submissions: 1 July 2005
Date of Judgment 8 July 2005
JUDGMENT OF FINNIGAN J
This is a claim by Originating Summons for 7 Orders arising out of the Plaintiff’s claim that she is the natural child of a man now deceased, known as Taniela Evo.
The Plaintiff’s claim is that towards the end of his life the Defendant became the de facto wife of Taniela Evo, and that upon his death obtained from the Fiji National Provident Fund the money due to Taniela Evo which was $22,000.00. The Plaintiff claims that in her application for those monies the Defendant knowingly failed to disclose the existence of the Plaintiff as the only child of the deceased and the existence of another person who was sister of the deceased. She claims that the Defendant obtained by deception an order in this Court for payment out of the money to her.
She claims that she is entitled to $10,666.67, made up as follows;
Total amount in FNPF - $22,000.00
Less Defendant’s share under
Section 6[1] (a) of Cap. 60 - 6,000.00
Balance - $16,000.00
Further entitlement of the Defendant
Under Section 6[1] (c) or 1/3 of
$16,000.00 - $ 5,333.33
Two-thirds of the Plaintiff’s share
Under Section 6[1](c) of Cap. 60 - $ 10,666.67
$16,000.00
The matter has been languishing in the Court for over a year. The summons was filed on 15 July 2004. One advantage of the delay has been that the Plaintiff has proved service upon the Defendant not only of the Originating Summons itself but also of a summons filed on 2 November 2004 for an urgent hearing and of another summons filed on 19 April 2005 again seeking a hearing date. I am satisfied that the Defendant is well aware of these proceedings. She has taken no steps and has not appeared. On the return date for the last summons, 3 June 2005, Counsel appeared for the Plaintiff and I fixed 1 July as the final date for written submissions from him. No submissions have been filed.
Decision
Having taken time to peruse the whole file I can see submissions are not necessary. Prima facie the Plaintiff is entitled to the orders that she seeks. I make the orders as set out in the Originating Summons as follows;
D.D. Finnigan
JUDGE
At Lautoka
8 July 2005
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2005/614.html