Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
High Court of Fiji |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT LAUTOKA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL ACTION NO. HBC0296 OF 1995L
BETWEEN:
ATUNAISA QABALE
1st Plaintiff
AND:
MESAKE VAKALOLOMA
2nd Plaintiff
AND:
KORESI ROBANAKADAVU
3rd Plaintiff
AND:
VILIAME TUNAVAKI
4th Plaintiff
AND:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES UNION
a Union duly registered under the Trade Unions Act.
Defendant
Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr. K. Vuataki
Counsel for the Defendant: No appearance
Date of Hearing & Judgment: 24 March 2004
EXTEMPORE JUDGMENT
This matter was commenced by the filing of a Writ in this court on the 6th September 1995. That Writ was filed on behalf of the four plaintiffs against the defendant and it claimed wages to August 1995 and thereafter until judgment.
The wages were owed by the defendant to the plaintiffs as a result of the failure of the defendant to pay wages after what appears to have been a significant disruption to the operation of the defendant in Fiji and relevantly at the Lautoka office. Each of the plaintiffs were employed by the defendant in various capacities.
The defendant failed to file any defence to the Writ and accordingly, on the 13th of October 1995, judgement was entered against the defendant in favour of the plaintiffs by default. That judgment provided in Clause (v), that general damages be assessed by the court, it is that order that brings the matter now before this court all be it some eight and a half years later.
The general damages that are sought by each of the plaintiffs are the unpaid wages between August 1995 and the 13th October 1995 being the date of judgment together with the unpaid FNPF contributions.
Each of the plaintiffs has submitted to the court, calculations of the wages from August to the 13th of October and the outstanding FNPF contributions. Each of the plaintiffs is entitled to receive those wages and those contributions. I should note that the 3rd plaintiff passed away on the 14th of November 1996, some 13 months after, judgement was entered in his favour against the defendant.
The Orders of the Court therefore will be: -
JOHN CONNORS
JUDGE
AT LAUTOKA
24 March 2004
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJHC/2004/393.html