Judgment (orally) to be followed by detailed judgment with fuller reasons.
On the first Count for damaging pro the appellant should not have been given the maximum sentence on a plea of guilty. I do nodo not
disagree with the sentiments expressed by the learned Magistrate when sentencing the Appellant.
The sentence of 2 years is set aside and substituted by one of 18 mo
On the 2nd Count. Looking at the injuries received by the complainant the sentence is on the high side.
The sentence of 2 yearset aside and substituted by one of 9 months which is to be concurrent with the sentence in e in the first count.
As for third Count: tfence is serious involving a moving car.
The sentence is neither harsh nor excessive and it is not wrong in principle.
ass=MsoNormal style="marginargin-top: 1; margin-bottom: 1"> 
