Chandra v State [2013] FJCA 33; AAU0042.2011 (18 April 2013)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIJI
APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.AAU0042 OF 2011
[High Court Criminal Action No. HAC 24 of 2011]

BETWEEN:

REENAL RAJNEIL CHANDRA
Appellant

AND:

THE STATE
Respondent

Coram : Chandra RJA
Counsel : Appellant in Person
Mr M Koroivou for the Respondent

Date of Hearing : 28 March 2013
Date of Ruling : 18 April 2013

RULING

1. The Appellant with five others were charged with one count of conspiracy to commit a felony by virtue of forged instruments contrary to s.385 and s.345(a) of the Penal Code and one count each of forgery contrary to s.335(2)(a) and one count of obtaining money by virtue of a forged document contrary to s.345(a) of the Penal Code.
   
2. The learned High Court Judge convicted the Appellant and the other accused in respect of the charges against them.
   
3. The Appellant was sentenced to a period of four and half years imprisonment with a minimum of three years on 19 April 2011.
4. The Appellant filed an application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence.
   
5. When the Appellant's application for leave to appeal was taken up for hearing on 28th March 2013 he made an application to withdraw his appeal as he had served his sentence and had been released on 18 November 23012.
   
6. A single Judge of the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to decide on an application to withdraw an appeal. In terms of Rule 39 of the Court of Appeal Rules the single Judge should direct the application for withdrawal to be made before the Full Court.
   
7. Therefore I direct that this case be placed in list to be heard before the Full Court.
   

Suresh Chandra
Resident Justice of Appeal