Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Court of Appeal of Fiji |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIJI ISLANDS
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.AAU0002 OF 2010S
(High Court Criminal Action No. HAC 33 of 2009S)
BETWEEN:
SHEIK MOHAMMED
Appellant
AND:
THE STATE
Respondent
Date of Hearing: Monday, 2nd August 2010
Counsel: A. Kohli for the Appellant
S. Puamau for the Respondent
Date of Decision: Monday, 2nd August 2010, Suva
DECISION OF BAIL PENDING APPEAL
1. I have listened with care to the arguments advanced by Mr Kohli on behalf of the applicant for bail pending appeal. He rightly stressed section 17(3) of the Bail Act 2002 and the likelihood of success in the appeal. The other two criteria are not in favour of the grant of bail since on 15th October 2009 Sheik Mohammed the applicant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Mr Kohli argues that the chances of success are high and that there is every chance of success in the appeal. Armogam (2003) FJCA 32 was not followed when an application was made to declare a prosecution witness hostile.
William R. Marshall
Resident Judge of Appeal
Solicitors:
Messrs Kohli & Singh, Labasa for the Appellant
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Suva for the Respondent
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/fj/cases/FJCA/2010/42.html